Skip to content

Breaking News

BIA holds that Immigration Judge needs to inform asylum applicants of biometrics deadline and consequences.

1 min readShah Peerally Law Group

BIA held that IJs must notify asylum applicants of biometrics requirements, deadline, and noncompliance consequences, and that IJs and BIA lack jurisdiction to consider if asylum-only proceedings were improvidently begun under a VWP referral. Matter of D-M-C-P-, 26 I&N Dec. 644 (BIA 2015

It is improper to deem an application for relief abandoned based on the applicant’s failure to comply with the biometrics filing requirement where the record does not reflect that the applicant received notification advisories concerning that requirement, was given a deadline for submitting the biometrics, and was advised of the consequences of his or her failure to comply.

Read Full Decision Matter of D-M-C-P-, 26 I&N Dec. 644 (BIA 2015

The information on this website is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Contacting Shah Peerally Law Group, including through this website, does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not send confidential information until an attorney-client relationship has been established in writing. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Free consultation

Tell us what you are facing.

We will tell you where you stand: which categories you qualify for, the realistic timeline, and what it costs, before you commit to anything. Consultations are confidential and available in English, French, Hindi, Urdu and Creole.

Urgent matter? A detention, a hearing date, an expiring status? Call rather than write.