In an amazing decision, seems DACA is back.
Roberts wrote the court does “not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies,” but said the Department of Homeland Security should revisit the issue.
“We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action. Here the agency failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance and what if anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients,” he wrote for the majority. “That dual failure raises doubts about whether the agency appreciated the scope of its discretion or exercised that discretion in a reasonable manner.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-587_5ifl.pdf
The information on this website is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Contacting Shah Peerally Law Group, including through this website, does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not send confidential information until an attorney-client relationship has been established in writing. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.